Michael Gouker reviewed This Is Your Mind on Plants by Michael Pollan
Review of 'This Is Your Mind on Plants' on 'Goodreads'
5 stars
This is just brilliant. The Drug War is so stupid.
This link opens in a pop-up window
This is just brilliant. The Drug War is so stupid.
"Are we deranged? The acclaimed Indian novelist Amitav Ghosh argues that future generations may well think so. How else to …
Good advice. I like the advice about how to best get feedback from readers.
The City of Gold and Lead ~ John Christopher/Samuel Youd
From the back of Collier …
I read this when I was 10 (about 50 years ago) and it haunted me for a long time. Now I realize this was my first taste of sci fi dystopia, though at first glance it seems a serfdom euphoria. On a repeat read today I found the MC grows in the story, and it has both positive and negative things about humans. What was most interesting is the blindness of the imperialist aliens who seem to have many of the same problems as the humans they replaced.
Young Will Parker and his companions make a perilous journey toward an outpost of freedom where they hope to escape …
Erikson is brilliant in the 5th volume of the series. Clever backstory which does an excellent job of centering the main tale. I love the philosophy, especially the brilliant juxtaposition of debt and slavery.
A comprehensive health book and lifestyle plan to help manage the body's natural rhythms offers …
I would have preferred to see a deeper analysis into the data. Too much repetition too. I am not arguing against the theory or the results though. When I changed my habits to eat in an 8-hour period, I lost 10 kg (80 to 70), exercise better, and function better at work and play. That was a long book, though, so this morning I'm sleepy.
Impressive in its scale, varies between serious science and humorous storytelling. I filled in a lot of gaps in my knowledge and learned I need to know even more. The chapter on genes and race is a brilliantly made compelling argument with a hidden deeper comparison I only grasped later (I love when that happens): Rutherford first shows how widely diverse his roots are, how tangled and twisted everyone is in general, makes the case for how genes cluster among groups and how they mostly do not (with language syntax transformations etc), and then later on I realized he was also showing how two people of almost the same roots (Galton & Darwin) are so different.