The Matrix is a world within the world, a global consensus- hallucination, the representation of every byte of data in cyberspace . . .
Case had been the sharpest data-thief in the business, until vengeful former employers crippled his nervous system. But now a new and very mysterious employer recruits him for a last-chance run. The target: an unthinkably powerful artificial intelligence orbiting Earth in service of the sinister Tessier-Ashpool business clan. With a dead man riding shotgun and Molly, mirror-eyed street-samurai, to watch his back, Case embarks on an adventure that ups the ante on an entire genre of fiction.
Hotwired to the leading edges of art and technology, Neuromancer ranks with 1984 and Brave New World as one of the century's most potent visions of the future.
I wanted a happy ending for the characters but I guess it fits more that it wasn’t. Aesthetically it’s a master piece, it's everything I love about cyberpunk. It's a classic for a reason.
Also yea I absolutely try to look like a razorgirl any chance I get.
Anyone wanting to argue than Neuromancer has aged like either milk or wine will readily find all the examples they could want to make their case; but the depiction of the consensual hallucination in Neuromancer still reads like a more futuristic network and virtual reality technology than anything we have today.
The words visionary and iconic get thrown around by hypebeasts and idiots to the point they're a debased and inflated currency, but describing Neuromancer without them is telling lies of omission. Parts of Neuromancer still describe a vision of what may yet come (and a far from idealised vision at that).
For anyone who hasn't read it, expect it to make less sense on your first reading than the second. Some things seem overly detailed but on rereading the same ink on the same pages somehow has written different words leaving me a completely different impression second time around. …
Anyone wanting to argue than Neuromancer has aged like either milk or wine will readily find all the examples they could want to make their case; but the depiction of the consensual hallucination in Neuromancer still reads like a more futuristic network and virtual reality technology than anything we have today.
The words visionary and iconic get thrown around by hypebeasts and idiots to the point they're a debased and inflated currency, but describing Neuromancer without them is telling lies of omission. Parts of Neuromancer still describe a vision of what may yet come (and a far from idealised vision at that).
For anyone who hasn't read it, expect it to make less sense on your first reading than the second. Some things seem overly detailed but on rereading the same ink on the same pages somehow has written different words leaving me a completely different impression second time around. I imagine well written murder mystery or noir genre works achieve, but I'm a philistine who hasn't read Agatha Christie or Raymond Chandler so this is naked speculation on my part.
I don't think this would turn anyone who doesn't enjoy sci-fi or cyberpunk into a fan, but any who've enjoyed either I think it's a worth the read and re-read.
It took a long time to read because it’s so dense and a little abstract the whole way through. Some noir plots in the beginning with an action movie ending, which is all well and good, but the characters don’t have much depth to them.
It’s a absolutely an important piece of sci-fi pop culture but as a novel it’s not memorable for me.
Review of 'Neuromancer (Remembering Tomorrow)' on 'Storygraph'
4 stars
I thought I'd read this before, but remember nothing. Which is surprising, because it was really freak'n cool. From the very first line, it's all so dang evocative. I had to re-read so much of it to savour each description. But also had to re-read a lot because I only read a page or two at a time, and I got lost a lot returning to it, because everything moved so fast. But hot dang, I see why it's a classic.
So very tough to rate this book, as I suppose it's tough with everything that you consider a classic. Neuromancer is -the- classic cyberpunk novel. When I read this I had flashbacks of playing Shadowrun and reading Shadowrun novels. I had no idea how closely the RPG really stuck with this world of deckers who fight ICE in the matrix. Its influence is outstanding.
The story itself is not that easy to read, not always captivating. Our protagonist is Case, a drug addict and former hacker who had the ability to access cyberspace removed when he tried to cheat his former boss. He's now a substance-abusing wreck living in Japan who does criminal jobs. A street samurai called Molly locates him and offers him a job working for an ex-military guy in a mysterious hacking project. If he joined the team, he'd get his cyberspace access back. Case joins and …
So very tough to rate this book, as I suppose it's tough with everything that you consider a classic. Neuromancer is -the- classic cyberpunk novel. When I read this I had flashbacks of playing Shadowrun and reading Shadowrun novels. I had no idea how closely the RPG really stuck with this world of deckers who fight ICE in the matrix. Its influence is outstanding.
The story itself is not that easy to read, not always captivating. Our protagonist is Case, a drug addict and former hacker who had the ability to access cyberspace removed when he tried to cheat his former boss. He's now a substance-abusing wreck living in Japan who does criminal jobs. A street samurai called Molly locates him and offers him a job working for an ex-military guy in a mysterious hacking project. If he joined the team, he'd get his cyberspace access back. Case joins and eventually ends up in Freeside, a space habitat for the rich, where the powerful Tessier-Ashpool dynasty resides. Their job is to infiltrate the residence.
Case is not exactly an easy protagonist to care for, and I was far more interested in Molly, the razor girl, than Case. The build-up to the showdown in Freeside is slow but once events get rolling, it is hard to put the book down. But there are also stretches that were unbelievably boring or confusing.
Anyone interested in cyberpunk should probably read the book that established the genre, but don't expect it to be a super-smooth read these days.
Good cyberpunk book, really interesting, keep you interested, but its a little bit confusing at some parts due to the excesive use of "cyberpunk" terms. Overall a pretty interesting book, highly recomended.